You
the need and the trade-offs
- Describe the need, in your own words
- Decide if budget or timing changes
- Receive a clear report
// method
A fix, an improvement, a question: every request follows the same short path. It is designed to answer you quickly, without ever losing control of what changes on your side. Two tools I built carry it: Edith, which prepares the work, and StatHall, which monitors your tools continuously.
// in a nutshell
Edith is a tool I built for my practice, powered by artificial intelligence. It is not a person: it is software that does the preparation work. It reads every request, sorts it by urgency, prepares the answer and brings it to me. The tool prepares; whenever something is at stake, I decide.
Every request is understood, classified and put in order of priority.
A proposed approach, then the work itself, on a separate copy.
What matters waits for my approval, and nothing goes live without my review.
// the path
An email, a message, a call: in your own words, no form or ticket to fill in.
Edith qualifies it — fix, improvement or question, urgent or not — and drafts a proposed approach.
I read the proposal, correct it or set it aside — except for tasks with nothing at stake, handled on their own. If the request affects budget or timing, you are consulted first.
The change is prepared on a copy, never on the tool you are using. Every sensitive step waits for my go-ahead, and automated checks run before my review.
Once reviewed, the change goes live and is checked from the outside. You receive a report: what changed, and how to see it for yourself.
// automatic or approved
Not everything needs approval. For each task, two questions: is the tool sure it has understood, and what is at stake if it is wrong? The answers decide who acts. Tasks with no added value are automated, and human attention goes where it matters.
high stakes
Going live, budget, data: a person decides, even when the tool is sure.
low stakes
The task needs judgement, or the tool is not certain: it proposes, I decide.
Sorting a request, summing up the day, closing an alert whose cause has gone, drafting the report. It happens on its own, and it stays on record.
// an example
An example to make it concrete, not a promised turnaround: every request has its own, announced as soon as it is sorted.
You report that your file export no longer includes the dates.
Edith has sorted the request: a fix, high priority. The tool suggests reproducing the problem before touching anything.
Between two meetings, I approve the approach from my phone.
The fix is ready on a copy, the checks are green. I review what changed.
It is live and verified: the export has its dates back, and you have the report.
// monitoring
The best request is the one you never have to make. StatHall continuously monitors your applications and servers: free space, certificates, security updates, crashes, end of support. It links alerts together to trace them back to their cause, and every day an AI writes up the summary.
// who does what
the need and the trade-offs
the tool that prepares
the tool that monitors
the one who decides
// for you
Sorting and preparation do not wait for me to be free: your request moves forward, even during my meetings.
The time saved shows in the quote: it is the AI-assisted option, priced next to the conventional one.
Everything is prepared on the side. Until it has been reviewed and approved, nothing changes on your end.
What was asked, decided and changed stays in writing: nothing depends on anyone's memory.
The same principles apply to your quotes, emails and invoices: a well-configured AI assistant prepares, you review.
Everyday AI assistants// contact
You describe your situation and priorities, and you leave knowing where to start — advice, project ownership support or delivery.